Within the process of guideline development, conducting specific systematic reviews or updating existing ones will usually represent the optimum means of summarising evidence on the effects of interventions. Such reviews will be focused on the subject area of the guideline and the needs of the guideline group, and can be tailored to the clinical questions that they pose. There will be occasions when available systematic reviews will represent the best available evidence, and their use will be necessary when resources are inadequate to conduct a new review. Under these circumstances they may be incorporated into the guideline, but the strength of subsequent recommendations may need to be lowered to reflect any shortcomings of the review.
1 Cook DJ, Greengold NL, Ellrodt G, Weingarten SR. The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:210-16.
2 NHS Executive. Clinical guidelines: using clinical guidelines to improve patient care within the NHS. London: HMSO, 1996.
3 Department of Health. Our healthier nation. London: HMSO, 1998.
4 Department of Health. The new NHS: modern, dependable. London: Department of Health; 1997.
5 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Nuffied Institute for Health. Implementing clinical practice guidelines: can guidelines be used to improve clinical practice. Effect Health Care 1994;(8):1-12.
6 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Getting evidence into practice. Effect Health Care 1999;5:1-16.
7 Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds. Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
8 Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Russell I. Developing clinically valid practice guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract 1995;1:37-48.
9 Hadorn DC, Baker D. Development of the AHCPR - sponsored heart failure guideline: methodologic and procedural issues. J Qual Imp 1994;20:539-47.
10 Royal College of General Practitioners. The development and implementation of clinical guidelines: report of the Clinical Guidelines Working Group. Report from Practice 26. London: Royal College of General Practitioners, 1996.
11 Eccles MP, Clapp Z, Grimshaw J, et al. Developing valid guidelines: methodological and procedural issues from the North of England evidence based guideline development project. Quality Health Care 1996;5:44-50.
12 North of England Stable Angina Guideline Development Group. North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management of stable angina. BMJ 1996;312:827-32.
13 Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason J. North of England evidence based guideline development project:Methods of developing guidelines for efficient drug use in primary care. BMJ 1998;316:1232-5.
14 Mason J, Eccles M, Freemantle N, Drummond M. A framework for incorporating cost-effectiveness in evidence based clinical practice guidelines. Health Policy 1999;47:37-52.
15 Royal College of Psychiatrists. Clinical practice guidelines and their development. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists. 1994; Council Report CR34.
16 Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Developing guidelines. BMJ 1999;318:593-6.
17 Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason J, North of England ACE-inhibitor Guideline Development Group. North of England evidence based development project: guideline for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in the primary care management of adults with symptomatic heart failure. BMJ 1998;316:1369-75.
18 Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason J, North of England Aspirin Guideline Development Group. North of England evidence based guideline development project: Evidence based guideline for the use of aspirin for the secondary prophylaxis of vascular disease in primary care. BMJ 1998;316:1303-9.
19 Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason J. North of England evidence based guideline development project: summary guideline for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus basic analgesia in treating the pain of degenerative arthritis. BMJ 1998;317:526-30.
20 Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason JM. The choice of antidepressants for depression in primary care. Fam Pract 1999;16(2):103-11.
21 North of England Asthma Guideline Development Group. North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management of asthma in adults. BMJ 1996;312:762-6.
22 Eccles M, North of England Evidence Based Guideline Development Project. North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management of dementia. BMJ 1998;317:802-8.
23 US Department of Health and Human Services; Public Health Service; Agency for Health Care and Policy Research. Acute pain management: operative or medical procedures and trauma. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care and Policy Research Publications, 1992.
24 Begg CB, Berlin JA. Publication bias: a problem in interpreting medical data. J Roy Stat Soc 1988;151:419-63.
25 Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991;337:867-72.
26 Freemantle N, Mason JM, Eccles M. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomised trials: the role and limitation of meta analysis. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 1999;5:304-15.
27 Smeeth L, Haines A, Ebrahim S. Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses -sometimes informative, usually misleading. BMJ 1999;318:1548-51.
28 Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy - I: prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. BMJ 1994;308:81-106.
29 Ioannidis JPA, Cappelleri JC, Lau J, et al. Early or deferred therapy in HIV infected patients without an AIDS defining illness: a meta analysis. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:856-66.
Was this article helpful?
This report may be oh so welcome especially if theres no doctor in the house Take Charge of Your Arthritis Now in less than 5-Minutes the time it takes to make an appointment with your healthcare provider Could you use some help understanding arthritis Maybe a little gentle, bedside manner in your battle for joint pain relief would be great Well, even if you are not sure if arthritis is the issue with you or your friend or loved one.